Wednesday, August 24, 2005

WAR ON TERROR HYPOCRICY: Crusaders are good Terrorists

PAT ROBERTSON IS A TERRORIST:

Farhat Quaem Maquami

More than a week after 9/11, on September 19, 2001, President Bush made the message to the world clear when he said that “anybody who harbors terrorists needs to fear the United States and the rest of the free world. Anybody who houses a terrorist, encourages terrorism will be held accountable.” With this frame of mind, in 2003 Iraq was invaded and Saddam Hussein was taken out and over 100,000 Iraqis are dead and many more are dying for the baseless allegations of the US government that he attempted to kill “Bush’s Daddy”— which rests on evidence as reliable as the WMD accusations. Then, why has Pat Robertson not been arrested and charged with inciting a terrorist act against a foreign head of state? Why is the same corporate media who is blindly ‘in bed’ with the US administration in its War on Terror not condemn Pat Robertson as a Terrorist?

Why is it that Mullah Khomeini’s Fatwa to kill Salmon Rushdie considered a terrorist act, but when American Mullah Pat Robertson advocates assassinating Hugo Chavez, it is said by the State Department that his comments were “inappropriate.” No one in the Bush administration who is obsessed with terrorism has suggested having him mentally examined so he would be committed to a psychiatric ward or be incarcerated for inciting his followers to murder.

This is hypocrisy! When people who have gone to the same Mosques as an alleged terrorists, even worship the same God as terrorists are as guilty of terrorists and must be prosecuted, incarcerated or taken out; but Pat Robertson can go with a slap on the wrist when he declared that:

“You know, I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it. It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war ... We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability. We don't need another $200 billion war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator. It's a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with." -Pat Robertson is calling for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and nobody does a thing to hi

Friday, August 12, 2005

TERRORISTS ARE BRITISH IMPERIALIST NOT MUSLIMS

IMPERIALISM BY TERROR: Islam as a Scapegoat

FARHAT QUAEM MAQUAMI

Four years have past since the Tragedy of 911was maliciously blamed on the Muslim World. No one questioned the fact that in the multifaceted and divergent Muslim World 99 percent have not heard of Al Quadae and had nothing to do with it. Moreover no one questioned the fact that Al Qaeda was a CIA Data Base formed solely to oppose communism. similar to Muslim Brotherhood formed by British intelligence decades ago. No one questioned the fact that except couple surveillance photos nothing is known about the so-called hijackers who hijacked those planes by “Box Cutters”, a weapon unknown in the Annals of Hijacking. Then the Crusade against Islam started.

Amidst the war cry for revenge the truth was lost and the investigation stopped. No one looked for the real perpetrators of 911. The Case was tried by the mass media ,. Overnight an army of no-nothing academia and pundits were created as “Terror Experts”. Then the propaganda machine began the war cry . The so-called “War on Terror” was coined, marketed and sold to the world and now after hundreds of thousands death , millions of Tons of WMD bomb drops on the middle East in a Tsunami of Death we are assumed to accept that the war is over and swallow the newly invented phrase of “ global struggle against violent extremism” over night. It is not coincidental that the U.S. administration coined the new slogan before the London Bombing and start marketing it right after.

It is high time to tear the curtain of deceit and expose the imperialism of terror which under the guise of the “war on terror” has terrorized the world for the past four years. It is time to question the facts as they unfold by the media and distinguish news from propaganda and political spins from academic discussions. The same way Mohammad ATTA was known and protected by Pentagon anti terrorist task force, Haroon Al Rashid, the so-called mastermind was protected by MI5.

Bombings in London are the latest manifestation of a rotten culture of ignorance and intolerance which is blinded to the facts and tries to manufacture scapegoats in order to justify its imperialistic design to control the world. Blair is using the London tragedy to promote himself and his policies of repression. Megaphones of paid pundits and hired agents are already echoing Blaire’s comeback speech “

British terrorists who colonized the world now are blaming the so-called radical Islam for the incident of their own making. Notwithstanding that Al Mohajiron, Muslim brotherhood, Fadaiyan Islam, Muslim Fundamentalists are creation of British intelligence.

In the same manner that in 911 a CIA Security training Exercises was underway to cover the actual event, * A security training exercise. This variant has already been flagged by skeptics. In it the dupes were offered good money to be "the enemy" in a security training exercise played out in the underground and were naive enough to believe the recruiter. They would have been engaged as actors and told they were only required to carry the backpacks to certain destinations to see if they could get them through the security people under training who had been given the “profile” of a suspect. They would also have been told that, for security reasons, they were not under any circumstances to talk to anybody else about the exercise. As a further precaution they would have been told they’d only be informed of their destination when they were briefed at Kings Cross station. They would probably have been told to meet back at the station for a debriefing. Such exercises are a normal part of security training, but we might question whether, in the atmosphere generated by Britain’s role in Iraq, four young Muslims would have been happy to take part.

A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as happened in real life on the morning of July 7th.

The fact that the exercise mirrored the exact locations and times of the bombings is light years beyond a coincidence. Power said the drill focused around 'simultaneous bombings'. At first the bombings were thought to have been spread over an hour, but the BBC reports just today that the bombings were in fact simultaneous.

The British SIS or one of their private companies offshoots could have hired Mr. Power and Visor Consultants to run the exercise. The exercise fulfils several different goals. It acts as a cover for the small compartmentalized government terrorists to carry out their operation without the larger security services becoming aware of what they're doing, and, more importantly, if they get caught during the attack or after with any incriminating evidence they can just claim that they were just taking part in the exercise.

This is precisely what happened on the morning of 9/11/2001. The CIA was conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning. It is clear that at least five training exercises were in operation in the days leading up to and on the morning of 9/11. This meant that NORAD radar screens showed as many as 22 hijacked airliners at the same time. NORAD had been briefed that this was part of the exercise drill and therefore normal reactive procedure was forestalled and delayed. That is why the Jet interceptors did not shoot the plains. That is why no black boxes were ever found. That is why the implosions which actually brought down the buildings was never reported.

This is not speculation. Kermit Roosevelt admitted on NPR radio that in 1953 the CIA and British intelligence carried out a wave of bombings and shootings in Iran. He then went on to brag about how they subsequently blamed the bombings on Iran's Prime Minister, Mossadegh. Do you understand, these people brag about what they do 40 years later? We would find out about what happened later, but by that time many innocent Muslims would be murdered and many other would be witch haunted just to keep the hate engine of the British Empire running.

Wednesday, August 10, 2005

BRITISH SIS AGENTS BOMB AND TERRORIZE IRAN:52ND ANNIVERSARY OF A COUP

BOMBINGS AND TERRORIST ATTACK IN IRAN: 52ND Anniversary of British Coup against Mossadegh

Farhat Quam Maquami

Not too long ago, Islamic terrorists and assassins hired and coached by London’s SIS were tools of British Imperialism in the Middle East. Iran was no exception. British Ambassador on Instruction from London nurtured Muslim Brotherhood and Faddayian Islam as their insurance policy for hegemony. In Iran, Navab Safavi, Khomienie, and Rafsanjani are among the most famous figures. Now that everybody is discussing London Faked Terror attack, it is better to discuss the real terror against Iran by the London based Islamic terrorists who were trained, financed and designed to terrorize Iranians 52 years ago.

A half-century ago, the US and UK engineered a spectacular act of terror against Iran. Not only did Western intelligence agencies obliterated Iran’s budding democracy, but their actions also resulted in thousands of Iranian patriots being killed by firing squads in the bloodbath that followed this act of terror. Looking from this real historical perspective the recent outcry about the London terror attack look nothing but a staged terror attack by the intelligent services to shape public opinion against innocent Muslims or Middle Eastern, cover up Tony Blaire’s bankrupt policy, improve his public image and enhance his prestige.

On August 19, 1953, CIA agents, with the blessing of corrupt mullahs, shamelessly arranged a terrorist coup to overthrow the democratically elected, secular government, of Dr. Mohammed Mossadegh in Iran. Their actions directly subverted a blossoming civic society and changed it into a dictatorial regime. It seems that every generation thereafter that carried Iranian aspirations for justice, freedom and real social change would also be hijacked by the CIA and its paid agents.

Five years ago, James Risen of the New York Times penned an excellent account of the terror coup. Among the materials he used to write his article was a previously secret report written in 1954 by one of the coup’s plotters. As Risen wrote, this report shows “how United States and British officials plotted the military coup that returned the shah of Iran to power and toppled Iran's elected prime minister, an ardent nationalist.”

You can read Risen’s article by visiting www.globalpolicy.org (http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/history/2000/0416ciairan.htm).

The size and scale of the terror coup’s plotters remains breathtaking, even today. The UK/US coup planners recruited thousands of Iranians to work as spies and thugs in support of this strike against democracy.

Iranian nationalists will be interested by Risen’s report, as it details Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi’s surprising initial reluctance to collaborate with the coup plotters.

As with many Cold War-era adventures, the US and UK justified their restoration of the Shah as part of their war against Communism. Of course, the Western powers cared little for the damage the terror coup would inflict on Iran’s culture, Iran’s national interest or the Iranian psyche.

The coup had its roots in a British showdown with Iran and the prize was Iran‘s oil industries. In 1951, Iran's Parliament voted to nationalize the oil industry, and legislators backing the law elected its leading advocate, Dr. Mossadegh, as prime minister. Britain responded with threats and sanctions.

Dr. Mossadegh, a European-educated lawyer refused to back down. In meetings in November and December 1952, British intelligence officials initiated a plan for a joint US/UK terrorist operation to oust the elected prime minister.

Risen’s superb article details the intricate nature of the US/UK plot. Rather than rehash it all again here, readers should examine it for themselves.

The tragedy of 1953 can be boiled down to the following observation — If Dr. Mossadegh had used his considerable political capital to rouse the people to stand up and defend the country, the Western terror coup would never have succeeded. This is the unmistakable lesson of the New York Times’s report.

Today, a second confrontation looms between Iran and the West. For Iranian nationalists, the stakes could not be higher. This time around, the West has a new weapon to use against Iran – the one million opportunistic so-called “Persian-Americans” living mostly in the state of California. Many of these people would gladly volunteer to play the role of puppet-ruler in Teheran that Iyad Allawi is playing for the West in Baghdad. These hyphenated Iranians are eager to subjugate Iran once again to the whims of the Western powers.

All true Iranian nationalists must dedicate themselves to the following: rooting out those elements in the country’s leadership, like the Rafsanjani clique, which are using their privileged position to loot Iran’s wealth and transfer it to banks in Western countries such as Canada.

In 1953, Dr Mossadegh and the Iranian nationalists failed to thwart the coup because of their own indecisiveness. As a result, the country plunged into a nightmare of autocratic and arbitrary rule — a nightmare compounded by the events of 1979. The so-called Islamic Revolution was led by a clerical faction pivotal to the success of the 1953 coup.

In 2005, a similar failure to act may have much more terrible consequences. By familiarizing themselves with the true events of 1953, Iranian nationalists can find the courage to steel themselves for the struggle to come. We have to look at Ahmadi Nejad actions to determine who is pulling his strings. His tough talk would be an empty rhetoric if is not followed by arresting and bringing to trial all Rafsanjani family as “Corrupt on Earth” and “Warriors Against God.” If his government does not confront the corrupt practices of the perverted British an American Islamists it would prove to be another subterfuge on Iranians by the London Terrorists.

Ahmadi Nejad can break with his British mentors and become an Iranian Nationalist or continue the wave of deceits and exploit Iranians as a puppet under the spell of British Imperialism using radical Islam as a cover. How long it would last depends on the Imperialist whim of the British and its interplay with the CIA and its vast propaganda machine and foot soldiers.